We are fighting for families in the Courtroom!
Legal Defense Fund
The constitutional authority of America’s elected County Sheriffs is under attack. An unprecedented legal effort seeks to strip voters of their right to elect their County Sheriffs and weaken the office that has long served as the chief law enforcement authority in their communities.
We are committed to standing with County Sheriffs in this fight. When constitutional principles are challenged, the courtroom becomes the front line. Defending those principles requires experienced legal counsel, extensive preparation, and the resources to pursue these cases wherever they lead.
Your gift to the Legal Defense Fund helps ensure we have the resources to respond when the constitutional authority of elected County Sheriffs is challenged.
Contributions may be used to support:
- Legal representation and litigation
- Court filing fees and administrative expenses
- Legal research and case preparation
- Expert witnesses and consulting services, when appropriate
- Other reasonable legal defense costs consistent with the purpose of the fund
Every donation—whether large or small—helps strengthen our ability to defend the Rule of Law, protect the constitutional role of America’s elected County Sheriffs, and preserve the right of the people to choose those who serve their communities.
Please make a contribution today. Together, we can help defend the constitutional authority of County Sheriffs and the rights of the citizens who elected them.
The Remembrance Project’s involvement in these cases reflects our unwavering commitment to defending American lives. We understand that legal battles are often complex and protracted, but we are determined to fight for the principles that protect our families and communities. We believe that by advocating for the integrity of our laws, we are taking a crucial step towards ensuring a safer future for all Americans. Every action we take is driven by the memory of those lives tragically lost, and the determination to prevent future tragedies.
Case No. 17-50762
City of El Cenizo, et al vs. State of Texas
Amicus Brief in Support of Texas’ Anti-Sanctuary Bill SB-4; City of El Cenizo, et al vs. State of Texas
2017 Press Release – The Remembrance Project Files an Amicus Brief in Support of Anti-Sanctuary Bill
Case No. 15-40238
State of Texas, et al vs. USA, Jeh Johnson, Secretary of Dept. of Homeland Security, et al
Brief Amicus Curiae of the Immigration Reform Law Institute, The Remembrance Project, National Sheriff’s Association, et al.
Filed May 11, 2015 with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Press Release. The Remembrance Project files Amicus Brief in lawsuit to save lives.
“Families of Victims Murdered by illegal aliens Join Texas and 25 other States’ Lawsuit”
The Remembrance Project files Brief of Amici Curiae with the U.S. Supreme Court. Filed April, 2016. Read the Amicus Brief here
City of El Cenizo, et al vs. State of Texas
Background. In May 2017, the Texas Legislature enacted Senate Bill 4 to prohibit sanctuary city policies. The law imposes duties on certain state officials and provides civil and criminal liability for violations of those duties. Three parts of the law are critical to this case: (A) the immigration-enforcement provisions, (B) the ICE-detainer mandate, and (C) the penalty provisions.
State of Texas, et al vs. USA, Jeh Johnson, Secretary of Dep. of Homeland Security, et al
Background. On November 20, 2014, the Obama Administration / Executive Branch announced (via a November 20, 2014 memorandum) he would unilaterally suspend immigration and deem four (4) million illegal aliens to be “lawfully present” and eligible for a host of benefits, including work authorization. This program, called DAPA (Deferred Action for Parents of Americans), goes far beyond forbearing from removal or enforcement discretion. That memorandum also expanded DACA (Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals), which was initiated in 2012 by a policy memorandum sent from former DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano.
Texas and 25 States file lawsuit.
On February 16, 2015, U.S. District Judge Andrew S. Hanen of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas in Brownsville ruled on the states’ lawsuit, issuing an order of temporary injunction blocking the federal government from implementing the Obama administration’s use of executive actions to grant relief from deportation, legal status, and permission to apply for work permits to illegal aliens who are the parents of a U.S. citizen or a lawful permanent resident.
Judge Hanen’s injunction blocked Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Jeh Johnson from implementing the Deferred Action for Parents of Americans and Lawful Permanent Residents (DAPA) program described in Johnson’s November 20, 2014 memorandum.
Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals hears Oral Arguments, upholds lower Court’s decision. The Remembrance Project attended oral arguments held in New Orleans, Louisiana.
U.S. Supreme Court results: 4-4 decision. Lower-court ruling remains intact. On June 23, 2016, the Supreme Court’s 4-4 vote lets the original decision issued by Judge Andrew Hanen and upheld by the Fifth Circuit Court to stand. The court did not issue an opinion but stated simply: “The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.”
While this is a victory for the states that brought the lawsuit against the federal government, it could be a temporary victory. Read chronology of proceedings in the New American here.